Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy A52 5G's global score of 91.3. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is noticeably heavier but somewhat thinner than Galaxy A52 5G, and both were released with only a few months difference. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Galaxy Z Fold 2 count with similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit lower pixel quantity in each inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen and a better 1768 x 2208 resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels and a bigger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2's battery duration is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A52 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.