Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-19 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| -- | Black Shadow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, with a 91.3 score against 91.1. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14. Galaxy A52 5G's body is noticeably thicker but lighter than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a really superior processing power than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a higher 1968 x 2184 resolution.
Galaxy A52 5G takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a much lower 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, they both have a same size aperture. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.