Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than the Sony Xperia 5 II, getting a score of 91.3 against 87.2. Even being the best device in this comparison, the Galaxy A52 5G construction is a bit thicker and heavier than Sony Xperia 5 II. Xperia 5 II counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia 5 II also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xperia 5 II has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better memory for apps and games than Xperia 5 II, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots better videos and photos than Sony Xperia 5 II, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better battery duration than Sony Xperia 5 II, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.