Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium, getting a overall score of 91.3 against 79.8. The Galaxy A52 5G body is way newer and a bit lighter than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium's, but it is also a bit thicker. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 and a much greater display pixels density.
Xperia XZ Premium counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A52 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot bigger camera sensor, a bigger aperture and a much more MP back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3230mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.