Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a 91.3 score against 79. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version while Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is somewhat heavier than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's extremely thinner and also notably newer.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density. The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a superior storage for applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger diafragm aperture, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.