Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is better than Xperia XZs's 77.2 global score. Even though Galaxy A52 5G is notably newer than the Xperia XZs, it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Sony Xperia XZs and Galaxy A52 5G count with very similar screens, because although the Sony Xperia XZs has a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better amount of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Xperia XZs, because it has more 2200 megahertz cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior storage for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xperia XZs has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a tinier camera aperture, a way smaller sensor, a much lower 19 MP resolution back facing camera and a lower video definition. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.