Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than Xperia Z4v's overall score of 78.8. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body is noticeably newer and just a little thinner than the Xperia Z4v's, but it's also somewhat heavier.
Sony Xperia Z4v features a little faster CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a graphics co-processor. Sony Xperia Z4v has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much better storage for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a larger aperture for better low-light images and video and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.