Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 409.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Xperia Z5, with a global score of 91.3 against 77.6. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Xperia Z5 has Android 5.1, offering some additional features. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's body is newer than the Xperia Z5's, although it is heavier and thicker.
Sony Xperia Z5 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher count of pixels in each screen inch. The Sony Xperia Z5 features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Sony Xperia Z5 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a better camera than Sony Xperia Z5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a back facing camera with much more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z5, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A52 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia Z5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.