Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Blasting black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, with a global score of 91.3 against 90.1. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features and improved performance. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G design is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a just a little better display pixels density, a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 64 MP resolution, the same video definition, a 0.59 inches back camera sensor and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a greater storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.