Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| -- | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Black Shark 4's 88.3 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Xiaomi Black Shark 4, although they were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit worse pixels amount in each inch of display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also counts with a quite bigger display.
Galaxy A52 5G captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger back camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 count with very similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.