Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Xiaomi Mi 9T, with a score of 91.3 against 82.2. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version, so it gives you some extra features and performance enhancements. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is newer, a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Mi 9T.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a CPU that is just as good as the processor in Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, both have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Mi 9T features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, a just a little worse pixel density and a bit smaller display.
The Galaxy A52 5G has much more memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.