Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, with a global score of 91.3 against 82.7. Galaxy A52 5G's design is newer, a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro. Both devices we compare here use Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite worse pixel density.
Galaxy A52 5G features much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a much more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.