Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, having a 91.3 score against 77.5. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a a lot newer and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, although it's also a little thicker. The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a little bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5300mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. Galaxy A52 5G takes way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera and a larger aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.