Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, having a 91.3 score against 83.8. Galaxy A52 5G is a somewhat lighter phone than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, but they are 0.33inches thick. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little bit smaller display and a little less pixels per screen inch.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G captures better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.