Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, getting a 91.3 score against 88.9. The Galaxy A52 5G design is newer, somewhat thinner and much lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10, providing the user some additional features and optimized performance.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a larger display and a higher resolution of 2088 x 2250. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a lot worse 64 MP resolution back-facing camera, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a way smaller sensor capturing lot worse quality videos and images and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photos and video.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.