Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| -- | Black and Ceramic |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, with a general score of 91.3 against 79.8. The Galaxy A52 5G body is just a bit thicker but extremely lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, and both were released with only a few months difference. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy A52 5G features a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1860 x 2480px and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back camera, they both have a same size diafragm aperture. Galaxy A52 5G has a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 12 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.