Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, having a 91.3 score against 87.9. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction is newer, a bit thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a little bit larger screen. Galaxy A52 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 4% more battery size. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with a 64 mega pixels, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.