Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Xiaomi Poco M3, having a 91.3 score against 78.2. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body is thinner and a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M3, even when both were released only a couple months apart.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A52 5G features a better camera than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.