Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, getting a 91.3 score against 82.4. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is just a little bit lighter but just a little thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and both were released only 0 months apart. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A52 5G. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite lower display density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen.
Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro and Galaxy A52 5G have really similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.