Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 77.1 general score. Galaxy A52 5G's body is just a bit thicker but just a little lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit higher pixels density and a little bit larger screen. Galaxy A52 5G features a lot better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G have quite similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy A52 5G features a greater memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.