Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a global score of 91.3 against 76.6. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 3 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bit greater pixels amount in each screen inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A52 5G features a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way better (4K) video resolution, a much higher resolution camera and a larger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.