Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's general score of 81.1. Galaxy A52 5G's construction is newer, just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, giving lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's camera is just as good as the Galaxy A52 5G one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and videos in low light situations, they both have the same video quality, the same resolution back-facing camera, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same sensor size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.