Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, getting a score of 91.3 against 79. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body is newer, just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a little better pixel density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a CPU that's very similar to Galaxy A52 5G's processor, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same video resolution, a same size camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.