Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's 83 global score. Galaxy A52 5G's design is a bit lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, even when they were released with only 2 months difference. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version, providing some additional features and performance optimizations.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a screen that is very similar to Galaxy A52 5G's display, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit lower screen density, they both have a same size screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger camera sensor and a camera with way more MP. The Galaxy A52 5G has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.