Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the ZTE Axon 20, with a general score of 91.3 against 77.8. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and the ZTE Axon 20 were only released 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction is a little lighter but just a little bit thicker than the ZTE Axon 20. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10, offering some nice extra features.
Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. ZTE Axon 20 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more storage to install applications and games than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
ZTE Axon 20 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition, a 0.59 inches sensor and a 64 MP back facing camera, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.