Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's general score of 85.3. Samsung Galaxy A52's construction is newer and lighter, but just a bit thicker than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a same size display, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a quite better display density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a way bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Galaxy A52 features a much better camera than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy A52 has just a little bit longer battery life than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3969mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.