Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Apple iPhone 12's 88.7 overall score. The Galaxy A52 design is somewhat thicker and heavier than Apple iPhone 12. Apple iPhone 12 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density and a little higher 1170 x 2532 resolution.
Galaxy A52 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Apple iPhone 12 has a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy A52, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Galaxy A52 features a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh. Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots a lot better videos and photos than iPhone 12, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking photographs or video in poorly lited environments and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.