Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A52's 90.7 overall score. Even though the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max and the Galaxy A52 were only released with a couple months difference, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max construction is somewhat heavier but thinner. The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1284 x 2778, a bit bigger display and a little greater screen density.
The Galaxy A52 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. IPhone 12 Pro Max has a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has less processing cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much clearer photos and videos than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with better battery duration than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.