Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 is just a bit better than Galaxy A52, having a 91.5 score against 90.7. Although the iPhone 13 and the Galaxy A52 were released only 6 months apart, the iPhone 13 is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. The iPhone 13 features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A52 features a very superior storage for apps and games than iPhone 13, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. IPhone 13 features a faster CPU than Galaxy A52, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a way better camera than iPhone 13, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 13, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.