Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a global score of 93.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A52's score of 90.7. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max's body is a bit thinner but way heavier than Galaxy A52, and both were released with only a couple months difference. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1284 x 2778px, a bit more pixels per screen inch and a little larger screen.
The Galaxy A52 features a much greater storage to install applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a better processing unit than Galaxy A52, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a way better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A52 features a little better battery life than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 3% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.