Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2021-03-17 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| -- | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52, getting a 95.6 score against 90.7. Apple iPhone 14 Pro's body is newer and just a bit thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A52. Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a way better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1179 x 2556 and a little bit higher pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better battery life than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 41 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.