Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is a bit better than the iPhone X, with a 90.7 score against 88.1. Although Galaxy A52 is extremely newer than the iPhone X, it's just a little thicker and a little bit heavier. The Apple iPhone X counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit better amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A52 has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. IPhone X has a little better processing power than Galaxy A52, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Galaxy A52 counts with a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 66 percent bigger battery size. The Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.