Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than Apple iPhone XR, having a 90.7 score against 82. Galaxy A52's design has the same thickness than the Apple iPhone XR, but it is a bit lighter. IPhone XR counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a way worse 828 x 1792 resolution and a little smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. IPhone XR counts with a better performing CPU than Galaxy A52, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Galaxy A52 features a better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Galaxy A52 has a really longer battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.