Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Apple iPhone XS's 84.2 general score. The Galaxy A52 design is newer, but a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than Apple iPhone XS. IPhone XS counts with a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a quite greater number of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A52 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh. Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.