Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2023-04-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.43 ounces |
| -- | Phantom Black and Storm White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2448 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 472 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the Asus ROG Phone 7, having a global score of 90.7 against 81.2. Galaxy A52 is an much older phone than the Asus ROG Phone 7, but Samsung was able to make it thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much faster CPU than Asus ROG Phone 7, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little sharper display than Asus ROG Phone 7, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a quite smaller display and a bit lower number of pixels per display inch. The Asus ROG Phone 7 has more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Asus ROG Phone 7 features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. Galaxy A52 has a bit better camera than Asus ROG Phone 7, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with higher video frame rate and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.