Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2024-03-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.90 ounces |
| -- | Desert Sand, Eternal Black, Misty Grey and Skyline Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 76.1. Galaxy A52's design is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, although it was released many years before. The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has a much better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra also counts with a quite bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much greater processing power than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy A52 has a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A52, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower resolution and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.