Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2021-03-17 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.43 x 2.36 x 0.51 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 2.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 405 pixels per inch | 143 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek MT6731 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 1100 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 512 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | PowerVR GE8100 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 4.82 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1600mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 3.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than Doro 780X, having a 90.7 score against 76.1. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a notably thinner but incredibly heavier cellphone than Doro 780X. The Doro 780X counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A52, because although it has 4 less and slower CPU cores, it also counts with 506 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a way better looking display than Doro 780X, because it has a way better screen density, a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a much bigger display. The Galaxy A52 takes way better photographs and videos than Doro 780X, because it has a much more MP back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Doro 780X, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Doro 780X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 1600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.