Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2021-03-17 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than Google Pixel, having a 90.7 score against 80.2. The Galaxy A52 is a a lot newer and just a little bit thinner phone than the Google Pixel, although it's much heavier. The Google Pixel has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher amount of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A52 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 features a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Galaxy A52 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.