Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 2 XL, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 82.5. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is noticeably newer, but just a little thicker and a little heavier than Google Pixel 2 XL. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a processor that is just as good as the Galaxy A52 one, and although the Google Pixel 2 XL has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A52 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Galaxy A52 counts with improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.