Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than Google Pixel 3's score of 80. The Galaxy A52 is a notably newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 3, although it is just a bit thicker and a lot heavier. The Google Pixel 3 features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A52, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.