Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 overall score. Galaxy A52's design is newer, but notably heavier and just a little thicker than Google Pixel 3a. Google Pixel 3a has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A52 features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52 features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A52 takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.