Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is better than Google Pixel 3a XL's score of 78.9. Galaxy A52's construction is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL's, although it's just a little thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little larger display.
Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 features a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy A52 has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A52 has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.