Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than the Google Pixel 4, with a global score of 90.7 against 81.9. Although the Galaxy A52 is newer than Google Pixel 4, it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels count in each inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a way higher 64 MP resolution back camera.
Galaxy A52 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.