Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, having a global score of 90.7 against 82.9. Although Galaxy A52 is a little thicker than Google Pixel 4 XL, it's just a bit lighter and newer. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A52. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Galaxy A52 shoots way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos and a much more MP back facing camera.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.