Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 global score. The Galaxy A52 is a noticeably heavier and a bit thicker phone than Google Pixel 4a. The Google Pixel 4a features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 4a's processing unit is just as good as Galaxy A52's processing unit, both have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A52 has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy A52 features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 43% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.