Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G's 87.5 general score. Samsung Galaxy A52's design is heavier and a little thicker than Google Pixel 4a 5G. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little better display density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A52. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A52 features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.