Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| -- | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 5's overall score of 89. The Galaxy A52 is a incredibly heavier and a little thicker phone than Google Pixel 5. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
Google Pixel 5 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a back facing camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.