Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-17 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.67 ounces | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting a overall score of 90.7 against 82.2. Galaxy A52 counts with a much powerful CPU than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a greater pixels amount per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels. The Galaxy A52 features a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.