Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than HTC U Ultra, having a 90.7 score against 77. The Galaxy A52 is a much newer cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, but it is a little thicker and heavier. HTC U Ultra features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels quantity per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much clearer pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a much larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a very superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.