Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than HTC U11, getting a score of 90.7 against 77.6. The Galaxy A52 design is newer, but a little thicker and somewhat heavier than HTC U11. The HTC U11 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. HTC U11 has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A52 features a really longer battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy A52 takes much clearer photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a much better 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a way larger sensor shooting much better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.